By Dave Jensen, CEO, CoPS on Doody · Commercial Pet Waste Station Service · August 2026
A pet waste program assessment is a structured review of what your community's program includes, what it costs, and where it falls short done before the budget is drafted, not after it's locked. Most communities skip it. They carry last year's number forward, and last year's number quietly carries last year's problems with it: the station nobody restocks, the corner residents keep complaining about, the service scope no one has read since it was signed.
The scale of the issue keeps growing. According to the American Pet Products Association's 2023–2024 National Pet Owners Survey, 66% of U.S. households own a pet. Inside a managed community, that ownership concentrates around shared lawns, trails, and pet waste stations which means the pet waste line in your budget is one of the few line items residents experience every single day.
Budget season is the one window when a board can actually fix a program instead of just renewing it. This article explains what an assessment covers, why the timing matters, and how the findings turn a vague renewal into a line item your board can approve with confidence.
A pet waste program assessment is a point-in-time review of six things: your station inventory and condition, the service scope actually being performed, the documentation you receive per visit, the materials being stocked, your contract terms, and the resident complaints the program generates. It answers one question: is the community getting what it's paying for? with evidence rather than impressions.
It isn't an audit of your vendor alone. Plenty of gaps are structural: stations placed where dogs don't walk, a service frequency set years ago when the community had fewer pets, or a scope that never included the trail everyone now uses. An honest assessment looks at the program, not just the provider.
The output should be short and usable: what's working, what's missing, and what each fix means for the budget. One page a board can read is worth more than a binder no one opens.
Timing is the whole point. Community association budgets are typically drafted in Q3–Q4, ratified by boards in October–November, and adopted before year-end to check your governing documents and state law for your community's exact requirements. An assessment done in late summer feeds directly into that draft. The same assessment done in January identifies problems the budget can no longer pay to fix until the following year.
There's a governance reason too. The Community Associations Institute names competitive bidding a core budgeting best practice for every service line (CAI). You can't gather comparable bids without first knowing your scope station count, frequency, coverage areas and the assessment is what produces that scope. Assess first, then bid, then budget. Reverse the order and you're pricing a guess.
A complete assessment covers six areas, and none of them require special expertise: just a walk of the property, a copy of the service agreement, and the complaint log. The table below is the short version; the downloadable assessment at the end of this article walks through each area question by question.
Two of these deserve a note. On materials: waste handling and bag sourcing are separate questions. The EPA identifies pet waste as a nonpoint source of water pollution (EPA, 2023), which is why timely pickup and disposal matter on their own. Bag and liner sourcing is a materials decision, and the verifiable standard there is USDA Certified Biobased documentation ask for the certificate, not the adjective.
On documentation: an invoice confirms you were billed. A completion notice confirms you were served. If your community can't tell the difference from its records, that gap belongs in the assessment findings.
The same handful of gaps shows up across communities of every size. Stations that were installed years ago and never revisited, even as pet ownership in the community grew. Service frequency that matches the original contract instead of current usage. No per-visit documentation, so nobody can say when a station was last serviced. And complaint patterns that point to one or two specific locations: a dense townhome section in Gwinnett County, a trail loop in Fairfax County that the current scope simply doesn't cover.
None of these are dramatic failures. That's exactly why they survive year after year: each one is too small to trigger a mid-year fix, and by budget time nobody remembers to raise them. An assessment is how small, chronic gaps finally get written down and written into the budget.
There's also a risk angle worth stating plainly. Overflowing stations and waste left in common areas generate the complaints boards spend the most time on, and unmanaged waste in shared spaces may create risk the community would rather not carry. A documented program is easier to defend than an informal one.
Boards approve requests they can compare and file correctly. CAI best practice separates operating funds, reserve funds, and contingency (CAI) and an assessment naturally sorts your findings into those buckets. Recurring service belongs in operating. Station repairs and replacements are capital items. A modest contingency covers mid-year additions.
The assessment also produces the defined scope that makes competitive bids comparable: station count, locations, frequency, coverage areas, and documentation requirements. Three vendors pricing one identical, assessment-based scope give a board a real decision. Three vendors pricing three different guesses give a board a reason to postpone.
In practice, the pattern is consistent: proposals built on an assessment pass faster because they arrive in the language boards already trusting a defined scope, competing bids, and each cost filed in the right fund. The assessment doesn't just find problems. It builds the case.
You don't need a consultant. A community manager or a board member can complete an assessment in an afternoon:
1. Walk the property. Count the stations, note their condition, and watch where residents actually walk their dogs. Placement gaps are visible from the sidewalk.
2. Pull the paperwork. Read the current service agreement's scope, frequency, renewal terms, and response commitments. Note anything that exists in practice but not in writing.
3. Check the records. Gather whatever per-visit documentation you receive. If the answer is "just invoices," write that down. It's a finding.
4. Review the complaints. Pull 12 months of pet-waste-related complaints and map them to locations and dates. Patterns will surface quickly.
5. Score and summarize. Rate each of the six areas, list the gaps, and note whether each fix is an operating, capital, or contingency item.
Do it in August or early September and the findings arrive exactly when your draft budget can still act on them.
When is budget season for HOAs and community associations?
Most community association budgets are drafted in the third and fourth quarters, ratified by boards in October–November, and adopted before year-end. Your governing documents and state law set the exact requirements, so confirm your community's own calendar then schedule the assessment ahead of the draft, not the vote.
Who should perform the assessment?
A community manager or board member can complete it; the checklist requires a property walk, the service agreement, and the complaint log, not technical expertise. Some communities ask a commercial pet waste provider to walk the property with them; just make sure the findings stay tied to evidence anyone can verify.
What if the assessment shows our current program is fine?
Then you've gained the documentation to defend the line item as-is which is its own win at budget time. A board that can show its pet waste spend was reviewed against a defined scope approves the renewal faster than one relying on "no news is good news."
How does the assessment help with vendor quotes?
It produces the defined scope station count, locations, frequency, documentation requirements that makes bids comparable. CAI names competitive bidding a core budgeting best practice for every service line (CAI), and identical scopes are what make those bids mean something.
Budget season rewards the communities that show up prepared. A pet waste program assessment six areas, one afternoon, one page of findings is the difference between rolling last year's number forward and presenting a scoped, comparable, correctly filed request your board can approve on the first pass. Assess in late summer, while the draft budget can still act on what you find. The communities that skip this step don't avoid the gaps; they just fund them for another year.
.png)
.png){kind=small}
.png){kind=small}
